Change Management Fundamental Basics “Gangnam THE ROCK Style” – Part 75
Christiano will learn over time that during periods of change, organizations should promote the belief that Hyperboles best illustrate that “Get Rich Easy Equals Dirty (GREED) Syndrome” requires a “Need Equals Equilibrium Deeds (NEED)” Leader who will win the fight against Soap Opera harassment duress created by those who will never confess.
In my opinion, organizations need to embrace the notion that during periods of change it is critical to insure that policies and procedures are in place to identify individuals contaminated with “Get Rich Easy Equals Dirty (GREED) Syndrome” as a by product of significant change.
It is important for organizations to acknowledge that during periods of change, the greatest risk to successful change is posed by contamination of the mass with “Get Rich Easy Equals Dirty (GREED) Syndrome” as opposed to a “Need Equals Equilibrium Deeds (NEED) Syndrome”.
In this New World Order (NWO) where there are persistent changes, be it through mergers and acquisitions or restructurings and reorganizations, the only constant which is assured over time is that of change. In order to be able to compete in this New World Order (NWO), there is one of two generic techniques.
The first technique which I refer to as “Get Rich Easy Equals Dirty (GREED) Syndrome” is predicated on the notion that when one feels threatened, in either fact or appearance, of losing their job, their home, their family, their wealth or any other “Raison D’Être”, one’s innate savage survival instincts tend to kick in, whereby one becomes frustrated with the change, to the point that one can start to look for short cuts to protect one’s turf including set-ups, back stabbing and cons of the intellectually disturbed dons.
For example, if one feels uncomfortable with the Change Leader because the proposed changes are contrary to one’s personal preferences, one may commence to enter the soap opera world, looking for a way to knock the Change Leader astray, while stepping on their head in order to be able to stay, while getting rich easy by playing dirty psychological games without any regrets or shame.
Taking this example one step further, one may create a fictitious harassment suit against the Change Leader in order to destroy their reputation and their livelihood so that they are taken out without anyone ever casting a single doubt.
Furthermore, taking this example to the extreme, even if the worst-case scenario arises and the truth is divulged, the damage to the Change Leader will have been done, while the guilty assassins will walk away scot free under the law, because unless they confess, the laws protect those who create artificial duress.
As is evident from my Hyperboles above, this type of approach is destructive, counterproductive and chaotic by its nature. For the record, Hyperbole is defined as the use of exaggeration as a rhetorical device or figure of speech. Hyperboles may be used to evoke strong feelings or to create strong impressions but they are not meant to be taken literally.
Now I would like to focus on the second technique which I refer to as “Need Equals Equilibrium Deeds (NEED) Syndrome” whereby one does not need to revert to a barbaric “Get Rich Easy Equals Dirty (GREED) Syndrome” approach because one learns to accept what they have as satisfaction of their basic needs, such that when business is combined with personal, family and religious equilibrium seeds, one does not need to commit dirty deeds for a bigger piece of the pie for which others choose to lie.
In summary, I refer to “Change Management Gangnam THE ROCK Style” as the belief that Hyperboles best illustrate that “Get Rich Easy Equals Dirty (GREED) Syndrome” requires a “Need Equals Equilibrium Deeds (NEED)” Leader who will win the fight against Soap Opera harassment duress created by those who will never confess.